Cases 1 - 10 of 248
MORRIS v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00395
Respondent:
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, N.C. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and MARY LOCKLEAR
Petitioner:
MATTHEW MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutledge et al v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant:
William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R and A D R
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00305
Petitioner:
JUSTIN GUNSAIN MATTHEWS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Safrit v. Ishee
as 1:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Matthew Aaron Safrit
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDuffie v. Baker et al
as 5:2024ct03042
Plaintiff:
Prentis McDuffie
Defendant:
Matthew Baker and Russell Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkinson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
Lucas Matthew Hawkinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Thomas v. USA
as 3:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
Matthew Lloyd Thomas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Stokes v. Oreskey et al
as 5:2023ct03336
Plaintiff:
Nazai Frank Stokes
Defendant:
Matthew Oreskey and Raleigh Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, Amy Jenkins, Daniel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
