Cases 1 - 10 of 745
Kalombo v. Matthew et al
as 0:2024cv01980
Plaintiff:
Pierre Kalombo
Defendant:
Matthew and Kandiyohi County Jail, the
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01884
Plaintiff:
Julie Matthews
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Matthews v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01833
Plaintiff:
Peggy Matthews
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Ames v. Chisago County et al
as 0:2024cv01397
Plaintiff:
James Ames
Defendant:
Chisago County, Adam Cinelli, Matthew Jacobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burgess et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01373
Plaintiff:
Matthew Burgess and Sharon J. Burgess
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Fairbanks et al v. Test & Balance Associates, Inc.
as 0:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Matthew Fairbanks, Jason Damman, Colin Beere and others
Defendant:
Test & Balance Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Boardman et al v. Rewitzer et al
as 0:2024cv01104
Plaintiff:
Joshua Boardman, Nicole Boardman and K.B.
Defendant:
Matthew Rewitzer, Kreemer Farms Trucking LLC, Jason Kreemer individually and d/b/a Kreemer Farms Trucking LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Keita v. Huckell et al
as 0:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Mamady Kalifa Keita
Defendant:
Scott Huckell, Matthew Russell, Jonanthan C. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Philos Mechanical, LLC v. Fairbanks et al
as 0:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Philos Mechanical, LLC
Defendant:
Matthew Fairbanks, Jason Damman, Colin Beere and others
Counter Claimant:
Joseph Sellers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
