Cases filed in Missouri
Cases 11 - 20 of 890
Clark v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff: Matthew L. Clark
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Clark v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00376
Plaintiff: Matthew L. Clark
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Key v. Doe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff: Matthew Key
Defendant: John Doe and T-Brothers Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Cerno
as 6:2024cv03054
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Matthew Cerno
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Matthews v. Walmart Inc.
as 4:2024cv00202
Plaintiff: Patricia Matthews
Defendant: Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Elburki v. City of Springfield et al
as 6:2024cv03039
Defendant: City of Springfield, Ken McClure, City Clerk Anita Cotter and others
Claimant: Mr. Kamel M. Elburki
Plaintiff: Kamel M. Elburki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Arnold v. Augustine et al
as 4:2024cv00173
Plaintiff: Richard T. Arnold
Defendant: Kenneth P. Augustine, Christopher Neace, Luke James Stobie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Covington v. Pyatt
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff: Kevin Covington
Defendant: Matthew Pyatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leigh v. Miller
as 4:2024cv00123
Plaintiff: Austin Leigh
Defendant: Matthew Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Leigh v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff: Austin Leigh
Defendant: Matthew Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?