Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Williams v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Steven Williams
Defendant:
William Marshall, Jarrod Wilson, Jonathan Frame and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamlin v. Horn et al
as 1:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Hamlin
Defendant:
Sgt. Matthew Horn, Mercer County Commission, City of Princeton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00194
Petitioner:
Jalisa Lashae Hawkins
Respondent:
United States of America and Matthew Scott Delligatti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cummings v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023cv00560
Petitioner:
Matthew Cummings
Respondent:
Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hawkins v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
Jalisa Lashae Hawkins
Respondent:
United States of America and Matthew Scott Delligatti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crim v. USA
as 3:2023cv00141
Petitioner:
Matthew Todd Crim
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Crimm v. USA
as 3:2023cv00140
Petitioner:
Matthew Crimm
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Beeler v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
Matthew Beeler
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hayden v. Searles et al
as 5:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Michael Hayden
Defendant:
Mr. Shelby Searles and Matthew Briske, SGT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ballin v. Shepler
as 5:2023cv00038
Petitioner:
Matthew James Ballin
Respondent:
Randolph County Magistrate Ben E. Shepler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
