Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bourdelais v. Mattingly et al
as 8:2018cv01685
Plaintiff:
Michelle Bourdelais
Defendant:
Linda Mattingly and Donna Sweeney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jenkins v. Prince George's County Police Department et al
as 1:2016cv02703
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kevin Jenkins
Defendant:
Prince George's County Police Department, Sean M. Mischo, Duane May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Prince George's County Police Department et al
as 1:2016cv00433
Plaintiff:
Thomas K. Jenkins
Defendant:
Prince George's County Police Department, Diane May, David Renaer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattingly v. Strong et al
as 8:2012cv00066
Plaintiff:
Wendi Mattingly
Defendant:
Elizabeth Strong and Robert Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In the Matter of v. Mattingly
as 8:2011mc00173
Petitioner:
In the Matter of
Respondent:
John A. Mattingly
Cause Of Action: Disciplinary Proceeding
Mattingly v. Fritz et al
as 8:2009cv02917
Defendant:
Richard D Fritz, Daniel J White and St. Mary's County Sheriff Office,
Plaintiff:
John A. Mattingly, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tani v. St. Mary's County et al
as 8:2008cv01950
Plaintiff:
Kess Tani
Defendant:
St. Mary's County, Francis J. Russell, Kenneth R. Dement and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Capitol Hotel Associates, L.P. et al v. Signature Special Events Services, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00419
Plaintiff:
Capitol Hotel Associates, L.P. and Bosse Mattingly Constructors, Inc.
Defendant:
Signature Special Events Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Aceituno et al v. Apartment Investment and Management Company et al
as 8:2007cv01869
Plaintiff:
Wendell Aceituno, Wendell Aceituno, Wendell Aceituno and others
Defendant:
Apartment Investment and Management Company, Aimco Properties, L.P. and NHP Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
