Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Aquilo et al. v. Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation
as 8:2021cv02054
Plaintiff:
Aaliyah Aquilo, Aaliyah Aguilo, Adalberto Bello and others
Defendant:
Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
Jay M. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Moore v. Edwards
as 4:2020cv01786
Petitioner:
Maurice Moore
Respondent:
Warden Sheldon Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOORE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv52630
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DUANE MAURICE MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. CCNO Southern Health Partners
as 3:2020cv01278
Defendant:
CCNO Southern Health Partners
Plaintiff:
Antoine Maurice Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Maurice Moore v. Dawn Bartram, et al
as 19-4040
Defendant / Appellee:
R. NAVEJA, Mail Room Screener, DAWN BARTRAM, Head Mail Room Screener, D. LUKOWSKI, Mail Room Screener and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAURICE MOORE
Moore v. Tharp, et al.
as 3:2019cv02060
Defendant:
Lucas County Sherriffs Department, T bonds LLC, Lucas County Sheriffs Department and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine Maurice Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Cook
as 3:2019cv01975
Respondent:
Judge Gary G. Cook
Petitioner:
Antoine Maurice Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. Dewiltz et al
as 3:2019cv01329
Defendant:
Adult Parol Authority, Jason Raynor, Lucas County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine Maurice Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Adult Parole Authority
as 3:2019cv00956
Defendant:
Adult Parole Authority
Plaintiff:
Antoine Maurice Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Lucas County Sheriff's Department
as 3:2019cv00722
Defendant:
Lucas County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Antoine Maurice Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
