Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Number 14 B.V. v. Analog Devices, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv02435
Plaintiff:
Number 14 B.V.
Defendant:
Analog Devices, Inc. and Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
B. et al v. The Maxim Integrated Products Inc. Welfare Benefits Plan
as 2:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Jane B. and D. S.
Defendant:
The Maxim Integrated Products Inc. Welfare Benefits Plan and The Maxim Integrated Products Inc Welfare Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Ridgeview IP LLC v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
Ridgeview IP LLC
Defendant:
Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Lenovo PC HK Limited v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01558
Plaintiff:
Lenovo PC HK Limited
Defendant:
Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schaffer v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv06816
Defendant:
Tracy C. Accardi, James R. Bergman, Mercedes Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Schaffer
Husselman v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07525
Defendant:
James R. Bergman, Tunc Doluca, Joseph R. Bronson and others
Plaintiff:
John Husselman
Burns v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07168
Defendant:
James R. Bergman, Tunc Doluca, Joseph R. Bronson and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Burns
Khan v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03982
Defendant:
James R. Bergman, Mercedes Johnson, Joseph R. Bronson and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Khan
Post v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01110
Defendant:
James R. Bergman, Tracy Accardi, Joseph R. Bronson and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Post
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
