Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Maynard v. QuikTrip Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Deloris J Maynard
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation, QT South LLC and Alex Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Barnet v. Maynard et al
as 4:2022cv02340
Plaintiff:
Clayton Landon Barnet
Defendant:
Justin A. Maynard, Google, LLC, First Sergeant Terry L. Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maynard v. Schneider
as 1:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Cody Maynard
Defendant:
L Schneider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Maynard v. Schneider ***TRANSFERRED TO BEAUMONT DIVISION.***
as 9:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Cody Maynard
Defendant:
L Schneider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maynard v. Sowell et al
as 1:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Cody Maynard
Defendant:
FNU Sowell, FNU Steffy, FNU Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Maynard v. Colorado Supreme Court et al
as 5:2020cv01180
Defendant:
Jacob Vos, William Lucero, The United States District Court for the District of Colorado and others
Plaintiff:
Alison Maynard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlisle et al v. Vos et al
as 5:2020cv01164
Defendant:
Jacob Vos, William Lucero, Mark Bankston and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Carlisle and Alison Maynard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maynard v. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2020cv00237
Plaintiff:
Mark Maynard
Defendant:
Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
