Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Gage v. Mayo Clinic, et al.
as 23-4410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALLY GAGE
Defendant / Appellee:
MAYO CLINIC and MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mayo Clinic Arizona v. USHEALTH Group Incorporated
as 2:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Mayo Clinic Arizona
Defendant:
USHEALTH Group Incorporated and Freedom Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mick Levin PLC et al v. Medicopy Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv01604
Plaintiff:
Mick Levin PLC, Bache & Lynch PLLC, Marcos Morales and others
Defendant:
Medicopy Services Incorporated a Foreign For-Profit (Business) Corporation doing business as Medicopy, American Medical Response of Maricopa LLC, Mayo Clinic Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgement
Roebuck v. Mayo Clinic et al
as 2:2021cv00510
Defendant:
Robert Scott, Nicole Secrest, Unknown Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Roebuck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crockette v. Mayo Clinic et al
as 2:2019cv04625
Defendant:
Mayo Clinic, Mayo Regional Practices Arizona, Mayo Clinic Arizona and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Crockette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Mayo Clinic Arizona
as 2:2018mc00030
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Mayo Clinic Arizona
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-16803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mackey v. Mayo Clinic Arizona
as 2:2016cv03084
Plaintiff:
Patricia Mackey
Defendant:
Mayo Clinic Arizona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
