Cases 1 - 10 of 110
Mays v. Stevens
as 2:2024cv01208
Petitioner:
Antonio Darnell Mays
Respondent:
Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00735
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffer v. Kosicek et al
as 2:2024cv00729
Defendant:
ProHealth Care, Texas Health Resources, Carlos Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Steven M Huffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
May v. Foreman et al
as 2:2024cv00607
Defendant:
Dr Garcis, Division of Hearings and Appeals Commissioners, Jennifer Arndt and others
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. McDermott
as 2:2024cv00450
Petitioner:
Edith Mae May
Respondent:
Jennifer McDermott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
May v. McDermott et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Jennifer McDermott, Mr Weber, Ms Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Jackson et al
as 2:2023cv01564
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Officer Jackson, Officer Garvela, John/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Rider et al
as 2:2023cv01691
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Pauline M Rider, Kenosha County Jail Classifications Department, Kenosha County Sheriffs Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Kiefer et al
as 2:2023cv01404
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Doctor, Doctors, Naph Care Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffer v. Kosicek et al
as 2:2023cv01516
Plaintiff:
Steven M Huffer
Defendant:
Carmen Kosicek, May Huffer, Kathy J Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
