Cases 1 - 6 of 6
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. DONALD J. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv02340
Plaintiff:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CITY OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, LOUIS DEJOY and DONALD J. TRUMP
Amicus Curiae:
RON WYDEN, TOM CARPER, BERNARD SANDERS and others
Petitioner:
THIRTY LOCAL AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA and CITY OF COLUMBUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2020cv02295
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE
Amicus Curiae:
JACK REED, ELIZABETH WARREN, SHELDON WHITEHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
BLUMENTHAL et al v. WHITAKER et al
as 1:2018cv02664
Defendant:
MATTHEW G. WHITAKER and DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, MAZIE K. HIRONO and SHELDON WHITEHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BLUMENTHAL et al v. U.S. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2018cv02143
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, CORY A. BOOKER, PATRICK LEAHY and others
Defendant:
U.S. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION, U.S. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ENGLISH v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv02534
Petitioner:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA and others
Amicus Curiae:
STENY HOYER, BRAD SHERMAN, ELIZABETH WARREN and others
Defendant:
JOHN MICHAEL MULVANEY, DONALD JOHN TRUMP and DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff:
LEANDRA ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BLUMENTHAL et al v. TRUMP
as 1:2017cv01154
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, BRIAN SCHATZ and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Amicus Curiae:
HAROLD H. BRUFF, PETER SMITH, BOB CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
