Cases 1 - 10 of 39
GILLENS v. CARVAJAL et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GILLENS
Defendant:
Director Michael Carvajal, Doe 1, K. Craddock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Warden
as 5:2022cv00308
Petitioner:
Cynthia Gilmore
Respondent:
Warden, Warden Lovette, H.L. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hammons v. Charles et al
as 5:2022cv00187
Petitioner:
Britt Jarriel Hammons
Respondent:
Samuels E. Charles, Jr, Gete Linda, McCaffrey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wesley v. McCaffrey et al
as 5:2022cv00176
Petitioner:
Michael Wesley
Respondent:
Warden Ryan McCaffrey and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Egan v. McCaffrey
as 3:2022cv00114
Petitioner:
Crystal Egan
Respondent:
Mr. McCaffrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jiles v. McCaffrey
as 5:2022cv00154
Petitioner:
Jeana N. Jiles
Respondent:
Warden McCaffrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Castillo v. McCaffrey
as 5:2022cv00141
Petitioner:
Francisca Castillo
Respondent:
Warden McCaffrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Donley v. McCaffrey
as 5:2022cv00132
Petitioner:
Rajih Rafee Donley
Respondent:
R. McCaffrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Curtis v. McCaffrey
as 3:2022cv00092
Petitioner:
Latasha Curtis
Respondent:
Warden McCaffrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Blackwell v. Warden McCaffrey
as 5:2022cv00125
Petitioner:
Ava Blackwell
Respondent:
Warden McCaffrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
