Cases 41 - 50 of 468
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01040
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11946
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11936
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11914
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Li et al v. Flannery et al
as 1:2021cv11898
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Yong Li, Swaida Monica, Fharah Ladey and others
Defendant:
Robert Flannery, Peter McAnespie, Karen McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Murray, et al v. McDonald
as 21-1931
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GRACE MURRAY, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, AMANDA ENGEN, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, STEPHEN BAUER, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GROCERY DELIVERY E-SERVICES USA INC., d/b/a HelloFresh
Interested Party:
SARAH MCDONALD, KEITH HEAD and KARI HAND BENTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11850
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Norton v. Rodrigues
as 21-1866
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYLER RAYMOND NORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL L. RODRIGUES, SBCC Deputy Superintendent
Defendant:
OSVALDO VIDAL, SBCC Superintendent, BRIAN MCDONALD, SBCC Director of Security, STEVEN SILVA, SBCC Director of Operations and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11652
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
