Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smallwood v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Shawn Smallwood
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Denis Richard McDonough, Michael D. Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022at00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
(PS) Lavy v. McDonough
as 2:2021cv01590
Plaintiff:
Marvell Lavy
Defendant:
Denis R. McDonough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McDonough v. El-Khal et al
as 2:2014cv01252
Plaintiff:
Linda McDonough
Defendant:
Jamaal D. El-Khal and Ampla Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
McDonough v. El-Khal et al
as 2:2014at00657
Plaintiff:
Linda McDonough
Defendant:
Jamaal D. El-Khal and Ampla Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
McDonough v. Hubbard
as 2:2011cv02094
Petitioner:
Clifford K. McDonough
Respondent:
Susan L. Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crim v. Management & Training Corp. et al
as 1:2009cv02041
Plaintiff:
John Michael Crim
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp., Management & Training Corp., Management & Training Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Zochlinski v. Regents of the University of California et al
as 2:2009at00105
Plaintiff:
Howard Alan Zochlinski
Defendant:
Regents of the University of California, City of Davis, County of Yolo and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Zochlinski v. Regents of the University of California et al
as 2:2009cv00185
Plaintiff:
Howard Alan Zochlinski
Defendant:
Regents of the University of California, City of Davis, County of Yolo and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
