Cases 1 - 8 of 8
McEvoy, Sr. v. Leavenworth County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2022cv02064
Plaintiff:
John McEvoy, Sr.
Defendant:
Leavenworth County Sheriff's Department and Andrew Dedeke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Augspurger v. Pyne, et al
as 21-1444
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN E. AUGSPURGER, D.D.S.
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS PYNE, D.D.S., in his official capacity, MARK ADAMS, D.D.S, MS, Panel Chair Panel A in his official capacity, PAIGE MCEVOY, MS, in her official capacity and others
Augspurger v. Pyne et al
as 1:2020cv03510
Defendant:
RDH Patricia Schonberger, DDS Thomas Pyne, MBA Evon Holladay, and others
Plaintiff:
DDS John E Augspurger and John E Augspurger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Noe v. Matevousian et al
as 1:2019cv02148
Defendant:
Kelly, B.O.P., Sara M. Revell and others
Plaintiff:
Peter George Noe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
Lyall et al v. City of Denver et al
as 1:2016cv02155
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lyall , Garry Anderson , Thomas Peterson and others
Defendant:
City of Denver , Michael B. Hancock , Robert C. White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Fania, et al
as 11-1421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARIAN HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN NAMED U. S. MARSHAL 1, UNKNOWN NAMED U.S. MARSHALL 2, FANIA and others
Hunter v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2011cv01289
Plaintiff:
Darian L. Hunter
Defendant:
Florence Correctional Institution, J. Wands, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith et al v. Hensel Phelps Construction Company et al
as 4:2007cv00153
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Smith, Daniel Thomas Smith, Daniel Thomas Smith and others
Defendant:
Hensel Phelps Construction Company, Hensel Phelps Construction Company, Richard Jezo Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
