Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Andrews et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv10897
Plaintiff:
Gerald E. Andrews, Mary Margaret Baker, John Franklin Bishop and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McMichael v. Diroff et al
as 5:2019cv13098
Plaintiff:
Thomas McMichael, III
Defendant:
Daniel Saldana, Adam Diroff and Matthew McFadden
Radke v. County of Monroe et al
as 2:2019cv11483
Defendant:
County of Monroe, Mitchell McFadden, Tod C O'Lone and others
Plaintiff:
James Frances Radke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cox et al v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2018cv11770
Plaintiff:
Darlene Cox , Mary Cox , Michael Cross and others
Defendant:
RICHARD D. SNYDER , City of Flint, Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. University of Michigan et al
as 2:2018cv11776
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
University of Michigan , Board of Regents of the University of Michigan , Pamela Heatlie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bellis vs. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv11289
Plaintiff:
McFadden Bellis , M C.1. , Eyondra McFadden and others
Petitioner:
Arnett Rison, III and A.1 R.IV.
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder , City of Flint , Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. Snyder et al
as 5:2018cv10633
Plaintiff:
Linda Robinson , Keri Turner , Taylor Brown and others
Defendant:
Richard Snyder, Flint, City of, Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellison v. Jennings et al
as 2:2016cv13865
Plaintiff:
Angelique Ellison
Defendant:
Robin Jennings, DOJ U.S. Government Agencies, Loretta Lynch and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
