Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Amanda McGriff v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 2:2024cv02636
Plaintiff:
Amanda McGriff
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Savills Inc. v. Musgjerd et al
as 3:2020cv00904
Respondent:
Robert Mcgriff and Christopher Musgjerd
Petitioner:
Savills Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Kim et al v. City of Belmont et al
as 3:2017cv02563
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hyobin Kim, June Kim, Paul Kim and others
Defendant:
City of Belmont, San Mateo County, Peninsula Humane Society and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert Garcia et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv01385
Defendant:
Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Does, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Fortenbury, Zackery Fortenbury, Gilbert Garcia and others
Kralovetz v. Spearman et al
as 3:2016cv00264
Plaintiff:
Rodney Theodore Kralovetz
Defendant:
Marion E. Spearman and D McGriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evergreen Media Holdings, LLC et al v. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP et al
as 2:2015cv01648
Plaintiff:
Tony Derosa-Grund and Evergreen Media Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Does, John M. Gatti, David McGriff and others
Jackson v. Austin, et al.
as 2:2014cv00649
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J. Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Austin, J. Lee, D. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Austin et al
as 2:2014cv00592
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J. Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Austin, J. Lee, D. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
