Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Jackson et al v. Village of Winnetka
as 1:2024cv03576
Plaintiff:
William Jackson, Kathleen Jackson, Chicago Title and Trust Company and others
Defendant:
Village of Winnetka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winters-McKay v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv16346
Plaintiff:
Crystal Winters-McKay
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mckay v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10426
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Mckay
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Namaste Laboratories LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company v. Herder et al
as 1:2023cv02782
Plaintiff:
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company
Defendant:
Chris Herder, John Herder, David Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
McKay v. Shoopman
as 3:2023cv03160
Plaintiff:
Marcus McKay
Defendant:
. Shoopman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKay v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv03159
Plaintiff:
Marcus McKay
Defendant:
J Smith and . Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00577
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor, II v. McKay et al
as 3:2019cv00397
Defendant:
John Koneman and Patrick McKay
Plaintiff:
Alan Desso Taylor, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Gavin et al
as 1:2019cv02006
Defendant:
C.M.B. Correctional Food Services, Dunlap, Premier Management and others
Plaintiff:
Ayo Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoller v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00140
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stoller
Defendant:
Marco Flores, Lisa T. Damico, Richard Galanti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
