Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Sofia Cano v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6200
Plaintiff:
SOFIA CANO
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRYAN P. STIRLING, DR. CHRIS KUNKLE and others
NEWTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv24071
Plaintiff:
MCKENDLEY NEWTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CANO v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2022cv04247
Plaintiff:
SOFIA CANO
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan P. Stirling, DR. Chris Kunkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
NEWTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11637
Plaintiff:
MCKENDLEY NEWTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Newton et al
as 1:2022cv00429
Petitioner:
Mr. Nathaniel Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden McKendley Newton, Mr. Alan M. Wilson and South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stokes v. Homeyer et al
as 5:2019cv03428
Defendant:
McKendley Newton and Paul Homeyer
Plaintiff:
Rodney Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Newton et al
as 2:2019cv03179
Respondent:
Alan M Wilson and McKendley Newton
Petitioner:
Clark D Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilder v. Medical Department Staff et al
as 0:2019cv01533
Defendant:
Ms Stacey Drawdy, Stacy Drawdy, Major Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Wilder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2017cv02637
Plaintiff:
Lamarcus Alexander Stewart, Jr
Defendant:
Richard Jenkins, Anita James, John R Pate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnett v. Newton et al
as 9:2017cv02071
Plaintiff:
William Leon Burnett
Defendant:
McKendley Newton and Tasha Cohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
