Cases 1 - 10 of 603
Marshall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00458
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles C Marshall, George P Keary, Mark Kellianen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Lee Johnson v. McKinney, et al
as 24-11103
Plaintiff:
LEE MITCHELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
MCKINNEY, PROCK, TYRE and others
McKinney v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01473
Plaintiff:
Regene Logan McKinney
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
MCKINNEY v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN T JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN M GRAHAM, DEPUTY WARDEN N BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, Warden ANTOINE CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NAUILUS INSURANCE COMPANY v. KLUB VIBEZ LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
NAUILUS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
KLUB VIBEZ, LLC, JAVARIUS MCCRAY, VAN LUCAS MCCLOUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Lee Johnson v. McKinney, et al
as 24-10898
Plaintiff:
LEE MITCHELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
MCKINNEY, PROCK, TYRE and others
Wills v. Howard et al
as 7:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Damien Wills
Defendant:
C Howard, TD Brown, T Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Huey v. McCall et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
William Bart Huey
Defendant:
Captain McCall and Officer McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
