Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Louis Williams v. Social Security Administration, et al
as 10-11173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS E. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, JOHN BLACK, Commissioner of Social Security, MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security and others
Williams v. Social Security Administration et al
as 3:2009cv00120
Plaintiff:
Louis E Williams
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, John Black, Michael J Astrue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
FORD v. ASTRUE et al
as 1:2009cv01243
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. FORD, jR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, LINDA S. MCMAHON and CAROLYN L. SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
David McMahon v. Michael Astrue
as 09-15873
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID S. MCMAHON
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Ledford v. McMahon
as 4:2008cv00143
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Ledford
Defendant:
Linda S. McMahon
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bonham v. U.S. Department of H & HS et al
as 1:2008cv01609
Plaintiff:
James W. Bonham
Defendant:
U.S. Department of H & HS, Michael O. Leavitt and Linda S. McMahon
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Marshall v. Astrue
as 08-1189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA S. MCMAHON, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Wilkinson v. McMahon
as 1:2007cv00301
Plaintiff:
Nathan Wilkinson
Defendant:
Linda S McMahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Woodley v. McMahon
as 6:2007cv00985
Plaintiff:
Terrell J Woodley
Defendant:
Linda S McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ingram v. McMahon
as 3:2007cv00823
Plaintiff:
Sylvia D Ingram
Defendant:
Linda S McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
