Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
McMahon v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv03485
Plaintiff:
Maiah McMahon
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
French v. Roderick et al
as 1:2017cv00338
Plaintiff:
Aaron Little French
Defendant:
R. Roderick, S. Shockey, J. McMahon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Principal Life Insurance Company v. McMahon et al
as 1:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
Principal Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Elise McMahon and David B.T. McMahon
Cross_claimant:
David B.T. McMahon
Cross_defendant:
Elise McMahon
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 8705
Meissner v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2015cv03323
Plaintiff:
Ashley Meissner
Defendant:
Van T. Mitchell and Shannon McMahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chisley v. Bishop et al
as 8:2014cv01322
Plaintiff:
Anthony Chisley
Defendant:
Frank Bishop, Richard Miller, William Bohrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durham v. Rapp et al
as 1:2013cv01350
Plaintiff:
James Troy Durham
Defendant:
Charles W Rapp, Albert L. Liebno, Jr., Marcus L Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McMahon v. County Commissioners of Kent County et al
as 1:2013cv00490
Plaintiff:
Darek Michael McMahon
Defendant:
County Commissioners of Kent County , Kent County Sheriff's Office , Kent County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
