Cases 1 - 8 of 8
DiTrolio v. McDonald's Corporation
as 1:2021cv10976
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation
Plaintiff:
Samuel R DiTrolio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson Puritan Site OU 2 Remedial Action Group v. A and J Tool & Findings Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00497
Defendant:
EEM, Inc., McDonald's Corporation, American Textile and others
Plaintiff:
Peterson Puritan Site OU 2 Remedial Action Group and Peterson - Puritan Site OU 2 Remedial Action Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Pizarro v. McDonald's Restaurant et al
as 1:2012cv11223
Plaintiff:
William N Pizarro
Defendant:
McDonald's Restaurant, Joselin Cabrera, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilkerson v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv10775
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Wilkerson
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation and Hogans of Newburyport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Maldonado-Olmo et al v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv01187
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Maldonado-Olmo, Juan R. Maldonado-Olmo and Jean Olmo-Aldeco
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, Juan L. Alicea-Lopez, Debbie Lopez-Velez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McDonalds Corporation v. Rappaport et al
as 1:2007cv11397
Plaintiff:
McDonalds Corporation and McDonalds Corporation
Defendant:
Louis Rappaport and Marshall J. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Gonzalez et al v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv01462
Plaintiff:
Mailyn Gonzalez, Omar Sierra, Conjugal Partnership Sierra-Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, Companies X,Y,Z, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Amador v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv01312
Plaintiff:
Antonio E Amador and Antonio E Amador
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, McDonald's Puerto Rico, Corp., Companies X,Y, Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
