Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Mcelroy v. The Bibb County Health Care Authority
as 7:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Astrid Mcelroy
Defendant:
The Bibb County Health Care Authority doing business as Bibb Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
McElroy v. Givens et al
as 2:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth McElroy
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Givens and Corbin Tunstall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
McElroy v. Gwinnett County Municipality et al
as 1:2023cv03763
Plaintiff:
David Jeffrey McElroy
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Municipality, Karen Beyers, Laura Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Todd McElroy v. R. Baker, et al
as 23-11805
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD MCELROY
Defendant / Appellee:
R. STAN BAKER, CHRISTOPHER L. RAY and WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR.
McElroy v. Baker et al
as 4:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Todd McElroy
Defendant:
US District Judge R. Stan Baker, US Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray and Sr US District Judge William T. Moore, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Muhammad v. Lee County Commission of Lee County, Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 3:2022cv00713
Defendant:
Deputy McElroy, Lee County Commission of Lee County, Alabama, Deputy Kamisi and others
Plaintiff:
Lateefah Muhammad
Petitioner:
Jay Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
