Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Marshall v. Warren County Regional Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kolona C. Marshall
Defendant:
Warren County Regional Jail, Child Advocacy Center, Detective Jessica Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morseman v. Hopkins County Jail Staff et al
as 4:2021cv00108
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Morseman
Defendant:
Hopkins County Jail Staff, Pennyrile Mental Health Services, Deputy Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. D.C.S.D. Medical Dept. Staff et al
as 3:2021cv00024
Defendant:
D.C.S.D. Medical Dept. Staff and Darren Hall
Plaintiff:
Horace D. Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Davis et al
as 2:2021cv02028
Defendant:
Medical Dept., D.R.T. Bradfield, D.R.T. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crockett v. Sloan et al
as 3:2020cv00793
Defendant:
f/n/u Escobar, Lyell Sloan and DCSO Medical Dept. & DCSO Dental
Plaintiff:
Corey Crockett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillespie v. Doak et al
as 5:2020cv01995
Defendant:
Portage County Commissioners, Portage County Jail's Medical Dept. and Sheriff David Doak
Plaintiff:
Alan Gillespie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crockett v. DCSO Medical Dept.
as 3:2020cv00322
Defendant:
DCSO Medical Dept.
Plaintiff:
Corey Crockett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crockett v. DCSO Medical Dept. et al
as 3:2020cv00199
Defendant:
Case Manager f/n/u Dixon, DCSO Medical Dept., Sgt. f/n/u Myatt and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Crockett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Crockett v. Clifton et al
as 3:2019cv01144
Defendant:
DCSO Medical Dept. and Jay Clifton
Plaintiff:
Corey Crockett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fritts v. Richland Correctional Ins. et al
as 1:2019cv01690
Plaintiff:
James Fritts
Defendant:
Richland Correctional Ins. and Richland Medical Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
