Cases 41 - 50 of 562
Medina-Rodriguez v. Canovanas Plaza Rial, et al
as 21-1928
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORBERTO MEDINA-RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
PANADERIA Y REPOSTERIA LA SEVILLANA, INC., ECONO RIAL, LLC, d/b/a Econo Rial, CANOVANAS PLAZA RIAL and others
Petitioner:
WILLIAM RODRIGUEZ-BURGOS
Concilio de Salud Integral de Loiza, Inc. v. Municipality of Rio Grande et al
as 3:2021cv01510
Plaintiff:
Concilio de Salud Integral de Loiza, Inc.
Defendant:
Municipality of Rio Grande, Angel B. B. Gonzalez-Damudt, Lydia A. Cordero-Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Ortiz-Medina
as 21-1738
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL J. ORTIZ-MEDINA, a/k/a Flattop, a/k/a Jesus A. Ruiz-Adorno
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-1739
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Torres Medina v. Christine E. Wormouth, Secretary of the Army et al
as 3:2021cv01362
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Torres Medina
Defendant:
Christine E. Wormouth, Department of the Army and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Garcia- Medina et al v. Adames
as 3:2021cv01273
Plaintiff:
Angelica Garcia Medina, Ada Garcia- Medina and David Garcia Medina
Defendant:
Israel Adames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaullini-Indij et al v. Banco Popular Puerto Rico
as 3:2021cv01219
Plaintiff:
JUAN J GUALLINI INDIJ, RAQUEL MEDINA RAMPOLLA, Juan J. Guallini-Indij and others
Defendant:
Banco Popular Puerto Rico and ABC Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Medina-Rivera
as 21-1277
Defendant / Appellant:
SADID MEDINA-RIVERA, a/k/a El Loco
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
CDA EMMA M. GREENWOOD
Sanchez-Roa v. Guerrero-Medina, et al
as 21-1155
Respondent / Appellee:
EDGAR GUERRERO-MEDINA, INES DEL C. CARRAU-MARTINEZ and DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE ABNER SANCHEZ-ROA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
