Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Medina v. Federal Bureau of Investigation of Boston
as 1:2010cv11607
Plaintiff: Daniel Medina
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigation of Boston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Russo, et al
as 10-1999
Petitioner - Appellant: JEFFREY MEDINA
Respondent - Appellee: LOIS RUSSO, Superintendent and THOMAS REILLY, Attorney General
Medina-Carbonell v. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico
as 3:2010cv01395
Petitioner: Pedro S. Medina-Carbonell
Respondent: El Pueblo de Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Medina v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2010cv10492
Petitioner: Daniel Medina
Respondent: Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
De-Jesus-Suero v. United States of Amerca et al
as 3:2010cv01208
Plaintiff: Alexis De-Jesus-Suero
Defendant: United States of Amerca, Federal Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinones-Medina v. USA
as 3:2009cv02198
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Rey Francisco Quinones-Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Adorno-Medina v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv01997
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Nelson J. Adorno-Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cardona-Sandoval v. Ledezma, et al
as 09-2191
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOAQUIN CARDONA-SANDOVAL
Defendant: US ATTORNEY GENERAL and BOP DIRECTOR
Defendant - Appellee: MR. LEDEZMA, DR. RIVERA, DR. MEDINA and others
Ortiz-Medina v. US
as 09-2188
Petitioner - Appellant: DANIEL J. ORTIZ-MEDINA
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES
Medina-Sanchez v. US
as 09-1824
Petitioner - Appellant: EDGAR M. MEDINA-SANCHEZ
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?