Cases 41 - 50 of 1,834
Garcia et al v. County of Tulare et al
as 1:2023cv01728
Plaintiff:
Jryden Luke Farrell Garcia, Jesse Garcia, Sr. and Monica Garcia
Defendant:
County of Tulare, City of Tulare, Deputy Timothy Holdbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Yolanda Medina v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv02249
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Medina
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
768 Ceres, LLC v. Katherine Taylor Kahn et al
as 2:2023cv09723
Plaintiff:
768 Ceres, LLC
Defendant:
Katherine Taylor Kahn, Heather Lynn Ferguson, Juliana Medina and others
Gastelum-Medina v. Cain
as 2:2023cv01713
Petitioner:
Roger Gastelum-Medina
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. City of Santa Maria, et al.
as 23-4277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTEBAN MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SANTA MARIA, PHIL HANSEN, JESUS VALLE, No 19091 and others
Medina v. Scally et al
as 2:2023cv01773
Plaintiff:
Albert Medina
Defendant:
James Scally, Bratt, Kenneth Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Medina-Gomez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4116
Petitioner:
NAUN GABRIEL MEDINA-GOMEZ and JOSUE GABRIEL MEDINA-URBINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kelly D. Robinson v. C. Fisher et al
as 2:2023cv09405
Plaintiff:
Kelly D. Robinson
Defendant:
C. Fisher, P. Castellanos, J. Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
