Cases 1 - 10 of 15
BECTON, DICKINSON & COMPANY et al v. MEDLINE INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2021cv12929
Defendant:
MEDLINE INDUSTRIES, INC., and MEDLINE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
C.R. BARD, INC., BECTON DICKINSON & COMPANY and BECTON, DICKINSON & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
PAUL v. MEDLINE INDUSTRIES, INC., et al
as 1:2021cv10542
Defendant:
MEDICAL SALES, LLC, MEDLINE MILLS INDUSTRIES, LLC, MEDLINE INDUSTRIES HEALTHCARE and others
Plaintiff:
TANYA MARIE PAUL
Cross Claimant:
AMAZON.COM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEDLINE INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, L.P. et al v. PHILADELPHIA ACADEMIC HEALTH HOLDINGS, LLC
as 2:2019cv03108
Plaintiff:
MEDLINE INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, L.P. and MEDLINE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA ACADEMIC HEALTH HOLDINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv15312
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Slater et al v. Medline Industries, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01040
Plaintiff:
Julia Slater and Charles Slater
Defendant:
Medline Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZUZEL v. SEPTA et al
as 2:2019cv00268
Plaintiff:
BELLA ZUZEL
Defendant:
MEDLINE INDUSTRIES, INC., CARDINAL HEALTH and SEPTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SHIRING et al v. MEDLINE INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2016cv01911
Plaintiff:
CLYDE A. SHIRING and MARGUERITE T. SHIRING
Defendant:
MEDLINE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
URICA, INC., v. PHARMAPLAST, S.A.E. et al
as 2:2013cv00323
Plaintiff:
URICA, INC.
Defendant:
PHARMAPLAST, S.A.E. and MEDLINE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
URICA, Inc. v. Pharmaplast S.A.E. et al
as 1:2013mc00031
Plaintiff:
URICA, Inc.
Defendant:
Pharmaplast S.A.E. and Medline Industries, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
