Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Humana Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02405
Plaintiff:
Humana Inc.
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Aaron et al v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00301
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Frieda Aaron , Katrina Allen , Rebecca Applegate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Aaron et al v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00214
Plaintiff:
Freida Aaron , Katrina Allen , Rebecca Applegate and others
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. , Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc. , Medtronic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Aaron et al v. Durrani et al
as 1:2013cv00202
Plaintiff:
Frieda Aaron , Katrina Allen , Sherri Lynn Allen and others
Defendant:
Abubakar Atiq Durrani , Center For Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc. , West Chester Medical Center, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Donald Alexander v. William Hawkins, et al
as 12-1298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald K. Alexander
Defendant - Appellee:
William A. Hawkins, Susan Alpert, Kathleen Erickson DiGiorno and others
Donald Alexander v. Boone Hospital Center, et al
as 12-1157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald K. Alexander
Defendant - Appellee:
Boone Hospital Center, William A. Hawkins, usan Alpert and others
Alexander v. Boone Hospital Center et al.
as 0:2010cv03373
Plaintiff:
Donald K. Alexander
Defendant:
Boone Hospital Center, William A Hawkins , Susan Alpert and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Alexander v. Boone Hospital Center et al
as 2:2010cv04081
Plaintiff:
Donald K. Alexander
Defendant:
Boone Hospital Center, William A Hawkins, Susan Alpert and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
