Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Meeks v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2022cv02834
Plaintiff:
Sam Meeks
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis, Darcy Klund, Marcus Ottney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boshell et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv01983
Plaintiff:
James Spann, Rodrick Butler, Stephen Swix and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Mendez v. Meek et al
as 0:2018cv02332
Defendant:
Lt. Sladek, Bryan Meek, Ms. Whiplinger and others
Plaintiff:
Raphael Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vigeant v. Meek et al
as 0:2018cv00577
Plaintiff:
Deborah Vigeant
Defendant:
Michael Meek , Paul Harmel , P. Robert Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Meeks v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
George Meeks
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mashak et al v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2011cv00473
Plaintiff:
Don Mashak and First National Repossessors, Inc
Defendant:
State of Minnesota , Minnesota Supreme Court , Mary Yunker and others
Counter_claimant:
Lee Wolfgram
Counter_defendant:
First National Repossessors, Inc and Don Mashak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mashak v. Meeks-Hull et al
as 0:2011cv00290
Plaintiff:
Don Mashak
Defendant:
Dannette Meeks-Hull, Michael Hull and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Meeks v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2011cv00120
Plaintiff:
Mark Meeks
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
