Cases 31 - 40 of 388
Kyte v. State of Oregon
as 23-1221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MEGAN KYTE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON
Harris et al v. Avocademy Inc
as 5:2023cv00579
Plaintiff:
Megan Harris
Defendant:
Avocademy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kyte v. State of Oregon
as 1:2023cv01648
Plaintiff:
Megan Kyte
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Auguiste v. Memorial Hospital of Sweetwater County et al
as 1:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Lex Auguiste
Defendant:
Memorial Hospital of Sweetwater County and Megan Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kyte v. Denver Health
as 23-1199
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MEGAN KYTE
Defendant / Appellee:
DENVER HEALTH
Kyte v. Denver Health
as 1:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
Megan Kyte
Defendant:
Denver Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henard v. County of Jefferson et al
as 1:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Henard
Defendant:
County of Jefferson, Jeff Shradder, R. Marinelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Appledorn v. Wyoming Department of Education Special Education Director et al
as 1:2023cv00093
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Education Special Education Director, Wyoming Department of Education Chief Academic Officer, Wyoming Department of Education Superintendent of Public Instruction and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Appledorn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bates v. Sheriff of Cleveland County Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Roland Keith Bates
Defendant:
Sheriff of Cleveland County Oklahoma, Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Red Rock Behavioral Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzales v. Cashman et al
as 1:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Zane D. Gonzales
Defendant:
Megan Cashman
Intervenor Defendant:
Heather Cashman and Shaun Cashman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
