Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Tanya Jones v. Megan Brennan
as 20-2190
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TANYA JONES, a/k/a Tanya Lorraine Jones
JoAnn Britt v. Megan Brennan
as 20-1620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOANN D. BRITT
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General
Cedrick Draper v. USPS
as 20-1210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CEDRICK EURON DRAPER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and MEGAN J. BRENNAN, POSTMASTER GENERAL
Shawnta Royster v. Megan Brennan
as 19-1338
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY KEARNEY, Postmaster, CARL W. STARLPIER, Supervisor and MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWNTA D. ROYSTER
Defendant:
STEPHEN SCHENNING, Acting U.S. Attorney and JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Draper v. United States Postal Service c/o Megan J. Brennan Postmaster General
as 3:2018cv00070
Defendant:
United States Postal Service c/o Megan J. Brennan Postmaster General
Plaintiff:
Cedrick E. Draper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Draper v. United States Postal Service c/o Megan J. Brennan Postmaster General
as 1:2018cv01011
Defendant:
United States Postal Service c/o Megan J. Brennan Postmaster General
Plaintiff:
Cedrick E Draper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1762
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1975
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Priscilla Pelzer v. Megan Brennan
as 16-1160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRISCILLA PELZER
Defendant - Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, United States Postal Services, Agency. Capitol Metro Area
Defendant:
JANICE SANDERLIN, SHARON PETERS and PAULA ARMATIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
