Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Chase v. O'Rourk
as 1:2018cv02179
Defendant:
Peter M. O'Rourk
Plaintiff:
Melissa C Chase
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
PARISI et al v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2016cv00179
Plaintiff:
MELISSA C. PARISI and MICHAEL C. PARISI, III
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEDDINI v. FORTY FORT BOROUGH CODE ENFORCEMENT et al
as 3:2016cv00983
Plaintiff:
JANET LINDA BEDDINI
Defendant:
FORTY FORT BOROUGH CODE ENFORCEMENT, JOSEPH S. TOCYDLOWSKI, JR., Melissa C. Diana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CARLSON v. COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00084
Plaintiff:
MELISSA C. CARLSON
Defendant:
COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC. and FAMILY DOLLAR
Cross_claimant:
FAMILY DOLLAR
Cross_defendant:
COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETERS v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv01144
Plaintiff:
MELISSA C. PETERS
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Diana et al v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A. et al
as 3:2014cv01890
Plaintiff:
Melissa C. Diana, Blue Sky Lake Louise and Melissa Claire Fredericks Trust
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase, N.A. , David Fein and Justin R. Drinkwine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bank of New York Mellon v. Diana
as 3:2013cv02358
Plaintiff:
Bank of New York Mellon
Defendant:
Melissa C. Diana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ANGELINE v. COHEN SEGLIAS PALLAS GREENHALL & FURMAN, PC et al
as 2:2013cv02453
Plaintiff:
MELISSA C. ANGELINE
Defendant:
COHEN SEGLIAS PALLAS GREENHALL & FURMAN, PC , JASON COPLEY , MARC FURMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
PAPADOPOULOS v. TD BANK, N.A.
as 2:2010cv02023
Plaintiff:
ANASTASIOS PAPADOPOULOS
Defendant:
TD BANK, N.A. and MELISSA C. BOYD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
