Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Stanley v. Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Stanley, Thomas Neeley, Dominick Garland and others
Defendant:
Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC, Dollar Tree Inc. doing business as Dollar Tree and Family Dollar, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Brantley v. Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
Melody T. Brantley
Defendant:
Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC and Dollar Tree Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Bivens-Prisoner
Shuler v. City of Hinesville et al
as 1:2023cv01429
Plaintiff:
Melodie V Shuler
Defendant:
City of Hinesville, Mayor Allen Brown, Assistant Mayor Ruan Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Cooper v. Doyle et al
as 8:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Melody Cooper
Defendant:
Officer James Doyle, Officer Kyle Khuen, Sgt. Willie Delgado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bready v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 8:2020cv01021
Defendant:
Cherie L. Henry, Dr. Contah Nimely, Dr. Druckman and others
Plaintiff:
David A. Bready
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shuler v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2018cv02343
Defendant:
State of Maryland and District of Columbia
Plaintiff:
Melodie Shuler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lambert v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01495
Plaintiff:
Melody Lambert
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
