Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Brook v. Ruotolo
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adam Brook, M.D., Ph.D. and The Estate of Dr. Judith Brook
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph Ruotolo, Esq., Ira Salzman, Esq., Diana Rosenthal, Esq. and others
Defendant:
Anthony Bacchi, M.D.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
as 23-182
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vivian Hill
Defendant / Appellee:
NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and Mental Hygiene Legal Services
Hill v. NYC Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene et al
as 1:2022cv07203
Plaintiff:
Vivian Hill
Defendant:
NYC Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene and Mental Hygiene Legal Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brook v. Ruotolo et al
as 1:2022cv06173
Plaintiff:
Adam Brook
Defendant:
Joseph Ruotolo, Esq., Ira Salzman, Esq., Diana Rosenthal, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv01846
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Genco v. Erie County Medical Center et al
as 1:2018cv00441
Plaintiff:
Benedict R. Genco
Defendant:
Erie County Medical Center, Mental Hygiene Legal Services, Magavern Magavern Grimm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
