Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lesly Pompy v. First Merchants Bank, et al
as 24-1249
Plaintiff:
LESLY POMPY, President, Interventional Pain Management Associates, PC
Defendant:
FIRST MERCHANTS BANK, fka Monroe Bank & Trust, MARC MOORE, Lt., Mantis, BRIAN BISHOP, Agent, Diversion Investigator, DEA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv09309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Lesly Pompy v. First Merchants Bank, et al
as 20-2259
Defendant / Appellee:
TINA TODD, Magistrate, First District Court of Michigan, JACK VITALE, Judge, First District Court of Michigan, JON LASOTTA, Officer, Mantis and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESLY POMPY, President, Interventional Pain Management Associates, PC
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FIRST MERCHANTS BANK
as 1:2019cv02365
Defendant:
FIRST MERCHANTS BANK
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
