Cases 1 - 10 of 236
Folekeu v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2024cv01651
Plaintiff:
Cherif Folekeu
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Appannagari et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2024cv01628
Plaintiff:
Ramamohana Reddy Appannagari, Padmalatha Appannagari, Tarun Deep Reddy Appannagari and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Karki et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Anita Karki and Newton Prajapati
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou and Merrick B Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Reid v. Garland et al
as 4:2024cv01417
Plaintiff:
Tyron Nathan Reid
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Alamdar Hamdini, Steve Dettelbach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
