Cases 31 - 40 of 382
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5027
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00428
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Fitch v. Garland
as 24-40017
Plaintiff:
Lamont Fitch
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Official capacity as U.S. Attorney General, Christopher Wray, Official Capacity as Director of F.B.I., Michael Carvajal, Official Capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Anthony Stokes v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5034
Petitioner:
ANTHONY DARNELL STOKES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, GARY SWANEY, Warden, FCI Manchester and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Escalona-Hernandez v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Felipe Escalona-Hernandez
Defendant:
Kerri Ann Quihuis
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 23-5303
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Michael J. Horowitz, United States Department of Health & Human Services and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
