Cases 11 - 20 of 759
LANG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2024cv01051
Petitioner:
EDWARD JACOB LANG
Not Yet Classified:
MERRICK B. GARLAND and HERIBERTO TELLEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
JEAN-BAPTISTE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2024cv01040
Plaintiff:
HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GRAY et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv00870
Plaintiff:
REGINALD A. GRAY and ONYINYE PATIENCE ONHANMA GRAY
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
NAJAFBEYGI v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
MILAD NAJAFBEYGI
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
