Antitrust Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Litovich v. Bank Of America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03154
Defendant: Natwest Markets Securities Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Citigroup Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Isabel Litovich, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-state Pension Fund, Frank Hirsch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
State of Louisiana v. Bank of America, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00638
Defendant: J. P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., JEFFERIES GROUP LLC and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF LOUISIANA, by and through its Attorney General, JEFF LANDRY and State Of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Puerto Rico Government Employees and Judiciary Retirement Systems Administration v. BofA Securities, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03261
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff: PUERTO RICO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES AND JUDICIARY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System v. Bank of America, N.A et al
as 1:2019cv03091
Defendant: Barclays Capital Inc, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2019cv02900
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Jefferies Group LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff: Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Police Retirement System of St. Louis and PUERTO RICO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES AND JUDICIARY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Dallas Area Rapid Transit Employees Defined Benefit Retirement Plan and Trust et al v. Bank of America, N.A et al
as 1:2019cv02715
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Barclays Capital Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff: Sheet Metal Workers Local 19 Pension Fund and Dallas Area Rapid Transit Employees Defined Benefit Retirement Plan and Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Torsella v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2019cv02438
Defendant: Barclays Bank PLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff: Joseph M. Torsella, in his Official Capacity as Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Lincolnshire Police Pension Fund v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2019cv02045
Defendant: Barclays Bank PLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff: Lincolnshire Police Pension Fund, PUERTO RICO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES AND JUDICIARY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION and Police Retirement System of St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?