Cases 11 - 20 of 199
Thompson v. Mesa, City of
as 2:2023cv01015
Plaintiff:
Richard Wayne Thompson
Defendant:
Mesa, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Camper v. Mesa Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
Fontaine El Devon Camper
Defendant:
Mesa Police Department, Paul Penzone, Nichlos Saccone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fantel v. Mesa, City of
as 2:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
John Fantel
Defendant:
Mesa, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act
Kohler #301619 v. Mesa City Attorney's Office et al
as 2:2022cv01969
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Dean Kohler, Jr.
Defendant:
Mesa City Attorney's Office and Charles Kent Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fantel v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2022cv01846
Plaintiff:
John Fantel
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Phoenix, City of, Mesa, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ellar et al v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2022cv01801
Plaintiff:
Donna Ellar and Shawn Oaklief
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, Mesa Police Department and Unknown Cyprien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kohler #301619 v. Mesa City Attorney's Office et al
as 2:2022cv01755
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Dean Kohler, Jr.
Defendant:
Mesa City Attorney's Office and Charles Kent Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
