Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Messenger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00527
Interested Party:
Kansas City Region Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Messenger
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
Hill v. Professional Solutions Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv00440
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hill
Defendant:
Professional Solutions Insurance Company and Andrew Messenger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Hill v. Professional Solutions Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv00433
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hill
Defendant:
Professional Solutions Insurance Company and Andrew Messenger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Messenger v. King
as 2:2022cv11421
Petitioner:
Jason David Messenger
Respondent:
Warden Chris King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Ionia, County of et al
as 1:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hill
Defendant:
County of Ionia, Jack Shattuck, Jon Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snowden v. Barry County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv01046
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Snowden, II
Defendant:
Barry County Jail, Andrew Messenger, Walter Albrecht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bodman #511468 v. Poff et al
as 1:2014cv00797
Plaintiff:
Chester Raymond Bodman #511468
Defendant:
Kris Poff and Unknown Messenger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz v. Kanzas et al
as 1:2013cv00392
Plaintiff:
Luis Ruiz
Defendant:
Unknown Kanzas, Unknown Messenger and Unknown Bruce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Messenger et al v United States of America
as 1:2011mc00067
Movant:
Scott Messenger and Danielle TenHave
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
