Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Novick v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co
as 13-492
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Karen Novick
Defendant - Appellant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Metlife Options and Choices Plan No. 512
Pardis Rahbaran v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 8:2012cv01238
Defendant:
Metlife Options and Choices Plan and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Pardis Rahbaran
Kowalski v. Metlife Options and Choices Plan et al
as 3:2011cv01048
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kowalski
Defendant:
Metlife Options and Choices Plan and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Alexander v. MetLife Options and Choices Plan
as 1:2011cv02202
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Alexander
Defendant:
MetLife Options and Choices Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Doe v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., et al.
as 2:2009cv02680
Defendant:
Plan Administrator - Medical Plan, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, MetLife Options Plan for Administrative Employees , MetLife Options and Choices Plan and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Novick v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2009cv06865
Plaintiff:
Karen Novick
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Metlife Options and Choices Plan No. 512
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Natale v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 3:2009cv00351
Plaintiff:
Rose Natale
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company of America and The MetLife Options and Choices Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Natale v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 8:2009cv00847
Plaintiff:
Rose Natale
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company of America and The MetLife Options and Choices Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
