Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv07897
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. Metaldyne Corporation
as 2:2009cv13025
Plaintiff:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Defendant:
Metaldyne Corporation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
RELIANCE MACHINE COMPANY v. METALDYNE CORPORATION
as 1:2009cv00533
Plaintiff:
RELIANCE MACHINE COMPANY
Defendant:
METALDYNE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv10924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Quintana et al
as 2:2009cv10923
Plaintiff:
Ketty Quintana and Metaldyne Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Ziebron et al v. Metaldyne Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv10164
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ziebron and James Vrana
Defendant:
Metaldyne Corporation, Heartland Industrial Partners LP, Hartland Industrial Associates, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Gardner et al v. Metaldyne Corporation
as 2:2008cv11076
Plaintiff:
Lee Gardner, Peter DeChants, David Liner and others
Defendant:
Metaldyne Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
