Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Barnes v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Defendant:
B Keener, J Faircloth, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Perez Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metcalf v. CSAA General Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Larry Metcalf
Defendant:
CSAA General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Corley et al v. Pine Ridge Equine Hospital, PLLC et al
as 4:2019cv00411
Plaintiff:
Corion, LLC and Anna Corley
Defendant:
Garrett Metcalf and Pine Ridge Equine Hospital, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Metcalf v. Patton
as 6:2015cv00076
Petitioner:
Dustin Metcalf
Respondent:
Robert Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Metcalf v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv01352
Plaintiff:
Derick W Metcalf
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Metcalf et al v. Bullock et al
as 5:2012cv00491
Plaintiff:
Charles Earl Metcalf , Winifred Laverne Metcalf and Winifred Lagreta Gaisford
Defendant:
James Donald Bullock and Ean Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Metcalf v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2009cv00631
Plaintiff:
Charles R Metcalf and Charles R Metcalf
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Metcalf v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. et al
as 6:2008cv00074
Plaintiff:
Deborah Metcalf
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., Blaine Hajok and Norman Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lundy v. Zacharias et al
as 4:2007cv00256
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lundy
Defendant:
C Michael Zacharias, Joseph H Casey, Mark Barcus and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
