Cases 1 - 9 of 9
First Metlife Investors Insurance Company v. Horn
as 2:2014cv02144
Plaintiff:
First Metlife Investors Insurance Company
Defendant:
Gary A. Horn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Nichols v. Metlife Investors Insurance Company
as 3:2010cv00651
Defendant:
Metlife Investors Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Steven Wagner Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Professional Performance Development Group, Inc. v. Carano et al
as 5:2009cv00884
Plaintiff:
Professional Performance Development Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Patricia Carano, Resource One Administrators, Inc., Med Care One, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Finkiewicz et al v. Cholakin et al
as 2:2009cv00300
Plaintiff:
Frank Finkiewicz and Edwina Finkiewicz
Defendant:
Jack Cholakin, Metlife Investors Insurance Company and Metlife Investors USA Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
First Metlife Investors Insurance Company v. Zilkha et al
as 1:2008cv10113
Plaintiff:
First Metlife Investors Insurance Company and First Metlife Investors Insurance Company
Defendant:
Marian Zilkha and Karen Patou
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robert A. Pritchard Marital Trust et al v. Metlife Investors Insurance Company
as 1:2008cv00305
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Pritchard Marital Trust and Robert A. Pritchard Revocable Living Trust
Defendant:
Metlife Investors Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Kendoll et al v. Metlife Investors Insurance Company et al
as 3:2007cv00846
Plaintiff:
Scott J Kendoll
Defendant:
Metlife Investors Insurance Company and Metlife Investors USA Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Kendoll v. Metlife Investors Insurance Company et al
as 3:2007cv00848
Plaintiff:
Lisa R Kendoll
Defendant:
Metlife Investors Insurance Company and Metlife Investors USA Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
In Re: Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation
as 2:2005cv04182
Defendant:
Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation, Public Belt Railroad Commission for the City of New Orleans, Gulf Group, Inc. of Florida and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jacynthia Fisher, Jennifer Bolton, Cecil Leavell and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Voyager Property and Casualty Insurance Company, AIG, Wiedemann & Wiedemann, P.L.C. and others
Cross Defendant:
KFMSGP, L.L.C., Law Office of Joseph M Bruno, Janice Morgan and others
Consolidated 3Rd Party Defendant:
Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans, Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, Orleans Levee District and others
Amicus Curiae:
Louisiana State, Claude W. Baudot, Allstate Insurance Company and others
Consolidated 3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Salvador A. Mangano, Lafarge North America, Inc. and St. Rita's Nursing Home
Counter Claimant:
Wilson, Grochow, Druker, & Nolet, Jacob D. Fucshberg Law Firm and Richard T. Seymour, P.L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Debbie Marie Thomas Richardson, Phillip Reed, Heber Dunaway and others
Claimant:
Robert Green, Sr., Jerry Alford, Mildred Delores Dean and others
Not Classified By Court:
Lone Star Industries, Inc., Steven M. Mauterer, Herman, Herman, Katz & Cotlar, LLP and others
Petitioner:
New Jourdan, LLC, Southern Province, Inc., Louisiana Congregation of Holy Cross and others
Cross Claimant:
Manson Gulf, L.L.C. and Lexington Insurance Company
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Melissa Pierce, Louisiana Public Service Commission, Entergy Services, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Board of Commissioners of the Orleans Parish Levee District, Vera D. Richard and Susan Williams
Consolidated Petitioner:
Joseph C. Domino, Inc. and Unique Towing, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
Washington Group International, Inc.
Respondent:
D. Blayne Honeycutt and Clifford Fayard, Jr.
Consolidated Counter Defendant:
Richard H. Weisler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
