Cases 61 - 70 of 112
Espinoza v. Brooklyn Metropolitan Detentio
as 13-2059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
George Espinoza
Defendant:
Brooklyn Metropolitan Detention Center and Cornell Companies/Moshannon Valley Correctional Center
Defendant - Appellee:
Zenk, Warden, Lamadue, Unit Manager, Francisco, Case Manager and others
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1662
Plaintiff:
Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Akil Sachveda and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Akhil Sachdeva, Anser Mehmood and others
Defendant - Appellee:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Pantoja v. Warden Metropolitan Detention Center
as 1:2013cv02267
Petitioner:
Rafael Pantoja
Respondent:
Warden Metropolitan Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1002
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-999
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
James Sherman
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-1003
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Salvatore LoPresti, MDC Captain
Turkmen v. Ashcroft
as 13-981
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ibrahim Turkmen, Asif-Ur-Rehman Saffi, Syed Amjad Ali Jaffri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations, James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and others
Intervenor:
Omer Gavriel Marmari, Yaron Shmuel, Paul Kurzberg and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Warden Dennis Hasty, former Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center(MDC), James Sherman, Michael Zenk, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center and others
Cabral v. Strada ( Jason Cabral)
as 12-4690
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jason Cabral
Petitioner:
Alvaro Cabral
Respondent - Appellee:
Frank Strada, Warden Metropolitan Detention Center, Brooklyn, New York
Cabral v. Strada
as 12-4647
Petitioner - Appellant:
Alvaro Cabral
Petitioner:
Jason Cabral
Respondent - Appellee:
Frank Strada, Warden Metropolitan Detention Center, Brooklyn, New York
Elorreage v. Belcher et al
as 1:2012cv03344
Respondent:
Special Agent Craig S. Belcher, Director of Medical Staff of M.D.C., Metropolitan Detention Center and others
Petitioner:
Edward Erie Elorreage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
