Cases 1 - 10 of 7,902
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60747
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, MIAMI
as 1:2024mc21750
Plaintiff:
U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, MIAMI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Backzkowski v. The Halal Shack Miami LLC
as 1:2024cv21754
Plaintiff:
Aaron E. Backzkowski
Defendant:
The Halal Shack Miami LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
United States Of America v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2024cv21702
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Dana Gonzalez, Armando Gonzalez, Florida Department of Revenue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
NEREE v. CITY OF MIAMI
as 1:2024cv21706
Plaintiff:
DUFIRSTSON NEREE
Defendant:
CITY OF MIAMI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilburn, Christopher v. Corporal Dozier et al
as 1:2024cv21726
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wilburn
Defendant:
Corporal Dozier and Miami Dade Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
LEVITSKY v. BAPTIST HEALTH SOUTH FLORIDA, INC
as 1:2024cv21686
Plaintiff:
HYESEON LEVITSKY
Defendant:
BAPTIST HEALTH SOUTH FLORIDA, INC doing business as MIAMI CANCER INSTITUTE AT BAPTIST HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
