Cases 1 - 10 of 16
(PC) Gaddy v. Pfeiffer, et al.
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Gaddy
Defendant:
C. Pfeiffer, S. Swain and V. Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Gaddy v. Superior Court of California, et al
as 21-16856
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN GADDY
Respondent / Appellee:
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN, (Delano-McFarland), DAVID WOLF, Judicial District Judge and others
Michael Gaddy v. C. Pfeiffer
as 19-17041
Respondent / Appellee:
C. PFEIFFER
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN GADDY
Michael Gaddy v. M. Townsend, et al
as 19-15786
Defendant / Appellee:
SANDOVAL, Chief Inmate Appeals Officer, M. TOWNSEND, Appeals Coordinator and M. VOONG, Chief Inmate Appeals Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN GADDY
Michael Gaddy v. C. Ducart, et al
as 19-15149
Defendant / Appellee:
D. HOTTINGER, Correctional Case Records Manager, D. BRADBURY, Warden, P. BADURA, Correctional Case Records Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN GADDY
Gaddy v. Ducart et al
as 4:2018cv04558
Defendant:
Associate Warden G. Jones, Associate Warden J. Peterson, P. Badura and others
Plaintiff:
Michael John Gaddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaddy v. Grosse et al
as 3:2018cv00081
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Gaddy
Defendant:
Thomas E. Grosse, II, Corey Thigpen, Zachary M. Riggan and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaddy et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
as 1:2016cv03093
Plaintiff:
Susanna Turose-Gaddy and Michael D. Gaddy
Defendant:
Wells Fargo NA , Federal Home Loan Mortgage Association, The and Sherry Dyess
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1452
Michael Gaddy v. Harold Reep
as 16-7177
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. GADDY
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD REEP
Gaddy v. Sprague et al
as 3:2016cv00197
Defendant:
Robert A. Sprague , T.E. Grosse, II and Zachary Riggan
Plaintiff:
Michael A Gaddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
